Request received
The contract names validation, filtering, sorting, escaping, and verification behavior.
FIXED SIMULATION
A fixed replay of each workflow. Step through it or let it play, and observe what happens at every stage — where it pauses, what it requires from you, and what evidence it leaves behind.
A curated, sanitized snapshot — no agent is running and no repository is modified.
Add a customer CSV export with filtering, numeric sorting, input preservation, and focused tests.
Investigate why exported rows sort "10" before "9". Stay read-only until the repair is authorized.
Report generation recomputes everything on each run. Propose a design only — no implementation code.
Review the branch diff for correctness, safety, and maintainability. Report findings only — do not edit.
Summarize this session so the next one can continue directly. Record facts, not the transcript.
The contract names validation, filtering, sorting, escaping, and verification behavior.
The existing customer export module is the owning boundary. No unrelated files need to change.
Goal, accepted behavior, out of scope, assumptions, and verification are ready for approval.
Production code and tests remain unchanged until the user approves implementation.
This is the point the workflow exists for. No file has been modified up to here.
Validation, filtering, sorting, and CSV escaping are applied at the existing module boundary.
Five focused assertions, the package test command, and syntax validation pass.
The durable record reflects actual files and verification. No commit was created.
The report includes a three-row sample that reproduces the wrong order every time.
The comparator reads cell text without numeric conversion, so "10" sorts before "9".
Root cause and repair plan are presented. No file changes until the user authorizes.
This is the point the workflow exists for. No file has been modified up to here.
Numeric conversion is added inside the existing comparator only; all other behavior stays untouched.
A new assertion covers numeric ordering, and the original suite still passes.
Goal: remove repeated computation. Constraint: report output must stay identical.
The real pressure is repeated computation time — not concurrency or memory.
Function-level memoization versus query-result caching; the difference is the invalidation strategy.
Query-result caching is recommended for its clear boundary and testability. Assumptions and follow-up checks are recorded.
The review target is the diff between the current branch and the main branch.
Requirements, correctness, safety, and evidence are checked one by one.
Escaping misses embedded newlines — confirmed real with a minimal input before reporting.
Three findings ranked by severity, each with cited evidence. The working tree is untouched.
The record must let a fresh session continue without rereading the conversation.
Implementation is complete and verified. One unrelated working-tree change belongs to someone else and stays untouched.
Key decisions, verification commands, and the unresolved deployment risk are written down.
The record ends with the next safe action. Nothing is written to disk unless a path is requested.